Archive for the ‘war’ Category

Bush Ducking Shoe

Sunday, December 14th, 2008

Erratica - Shoe Ducking

This has to be one of the funniest presidential episodes I’ve seen in a number of years. During Bush’s farewell visit to Iraq, an angry (pissed-off is more accurate) Iraqi threw what I imagine were his shoes right at the president’s face! The Iraqi has to be given credit on two counts, a great arm – pitched both shoes straight to the face- and for having some big cojones -it takes some nerve attempting to do something to the president of the country that is occupying yours… remember Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo?
I also have to give credit to Bush’s reflexes though, he ducked those shoes as if hiding is all he’s ever done in his life.

Read the CNN article and and watch the video here.

Plain idiocy or plain insanity?

Thursday, September 25th, 2008

Israel gave serious thought this spring to launching a military strike on Iran’s nuclear sites but was told by President George W Bush that he would not support it and did not expect to revise that view for the rest of his presidency

So Bush is now THE voice or reason? We’re all screwed.

Read the scary news from The Guardian here.

Raids into Pakistan

Friday, September 12th, 2008

Alright, so Bush has unilaterally OK’d military raids into Pakistan -incursions in which civilians have been killed- without seeking permission first from the Pakistani government. This is of course not the first time something of this sort happens, but it seems like it being ok is SO ingrained in culture and driven home by the media that it doesn’t seem to cause anyone to flinch. I’m going to get all Chomskyan on you:

Lets start from the beginning:
If you look at the UN Charter, chapter 1, article 2:
2. All Members, in order to ensure to all of them the rights and benefits resulting from membership, shall fulfill in good faith the obligations assumed by them in accordance with the present Charter.

(more…)

P.S.1

Friday, August 8th, 2008

Erratica - P.S.1

Looking through my pictures of the past visit to P.S.1, I found this picture of one of the greatest pieces currently on display. I can’t really remember the artist’s name (nor the piece’s name for that matter) but its simplicity, its economy of means and its in-your-face-ness are what make it completely astounding to walk through. It’s in the second floor, so if you have a chance to visit the museum, don’t miss it.

Teargas and Plateglass

Friday, July 25th, 2008

Gabe pointed me to these incredible videos by Teargas and Plateglass. The songs are even more beautiful than the visuals. Heavy stuff, yet beautiful.

Visit their site here.

View the other vids after the jump.

(more…)

Waterboarding + Ashcroft = not torture

Friday, July 18th, 2008

John Ashcroft defended yesterday waterboarding as not constituting torture before a House panel. There were of course some very valuable pearls dropped in there:

The reports that I have heard, and I have no reason to disbelieve them, indicate that they were very valuable,” Ashcroft said, adding that CIA Director George Tenet indicated the “value of the information received from the use of enhanced interrogation techniques — I don’t know whether he was saying waterboarding or not, but assume that he was for a moment — the value of that information exceeded the value of information that was received from all other sources.”

“I believe a report of waterboarding would be serious, but I do not believe it would define torture,” Ashcroft said, responding to questions from Rep. Maxine Waters, D-California.

Can someone remind John Ashcroft of a little piece of history:

In the war crimes tribunals that followed Japan’s defeat in World War II, the issue of waterboarding was sometimes raised. In 1947, the U.S. charged a Japanese officer, Yukio Asano, with war crimes for waterboarding a U.S. civilian. Asano was sentenced to 15 years of hard labor.

“All of these trials elicited compelling descriptions of water torture from its victims, and resulted in severe punishment for its perpetrators,” writes Evan Wallach in the Columbia Journal of Transnational Law.

On Jan. 21, 1968, The Washington Post ran a front-page photo of a U.S. soldier supervising the waterboarding of a captured North Vietnamese soldier. The caption said the technique induced “a flooding sense of suffocation and drowning, meant to make him talk.” The picture led to an Army investigation and, two months later, the court martial of the soldier.

Read the CNN article on Ashcroft’s nonsense here and the quotes following here , from an NPR note. Don’t miss the account at the end of the article on what it actually feels like.

War in the Age of Intelligent Machines

Wednesday, July 9th, 2008

A passage from Manuel DeLanda’s book “War in the Age of Intelligent Machines” (1991), which I’m almost done with.

Almost without exception, secret service organizations have thrived in times of turbulence and, conversely, have seen their power vanish as turmoil slows. For this reason, they survive by inciting social turbulence, spreading rumors and inventing imaginary enemies, fifth columns, and bomber and missile gaps. They need to keep society in constant alert, in a generalized state of fear and paranoia, in order to sustain themselves. This has led to the development of a gigantic “espionage industry, ” whose entire existence is based on a bluff few governments dare to call:

(more…)

El Tiempo

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008

Erratica - El Tiempo

This is what the main Colombian newspaper looked liked today at 4:00pm after the rescuing by the army of some high profile hostages held by the FARC.

Nevermind the other 700+ non high profile still held captive.

What will change?

Monday, June 2nd, 2008

If it is Obama, Clinton or McCain in regards to the U.S Middle East policy? Not much. Chomsky has a short article on some of the key points based on the candidates record/positions.
For the record: I agree.

Read it in his website here.

Say what Mrs. Clinton?

Tuesday, April 22nd, 2008

Clinton this morning continued her tough military talk, saying she would “obliterate” Iran if the Shia Muslim theocracy launches a nuclear attack on Israel while she is president.

“I want the Iranians to know that if I am president we will attack Iran, and I want them to understand that,” she told ABC News, when asked how she would respond.

“Whatever stage of development they might be in their nuclear weapons programme in the next ten years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them.

“That’s a terrible thing to say, but those people who run Iran need to understand that, because that perhaps will deter them from doing something that would be reckless, foolish and tragic.”

Read the full article from The Guardian here.

No, it’s not a terrible thing to say, it’s an insane thing to say.